Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (41196)	11/10/1998 5:12:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (4) of 1573433

<So why isn't it in production?> Probably because it WAS disadvantageous to make it under current market conditions. I mean the 300MHz parts. What would you prefer, to make 4M parts and sell them at $105 each, or 2M (135mm vs 81mm) parts and get only $150 at very best? Don't be ridiculous and suggest that a customer would pay more for a K6-3 the P-II price, even if K6-3 would outperform it by 10-20%. Market perception, brand name.. you name excuses. At most, a customer will pay more only in proportion to performance gain relative to the current product, K6-2, not P-II. The 400MHz-K6-3 could be a very different story: there are different pricing rules for parts above and below the current "sweet spot". Is not it the main purpose of an enterprise to make money in the first place, as Pal is reminding us every time?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next