SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ali Chen who wrote (41198)11/10/1998 6:50:00 PM
From: Maxwell  Read Replies (3) of 1573400
 
Ali:

I think it is best leave this K6-3 subject alone. These Intelabees always looking for ideas to criticize AMD. I remembered when they argued the following subjects:

1) No top tier OEMs
2) Can produce K6-233, has to jack voltage to 3.2V over 2.9V
3) K6 has the VD virus
4) Phatom 0.25um K6
5) No mobile K6
6) K6-2 is late. No software for K6-2
7) Yield problem
8) No 333MHz
9) 350MHz is marginal 333MHz
10) 350MHz is late
11) AMD will never get beyond 300MHz
12) QuakeII is faster on Intel CPU
13) Software bug on K6-2-350
14) Miss 400MHz Christmas
...
....
Blah, Blah, Blah

And Now K6-3 is vaporware and K7 is all foils.

They are all full of shit.

Maxwell
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News