Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 175.25

+0.6%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18156)	11/10/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (3) of 152472

"I think they are taking themselves a little bit too seriously (with that first page)." Not at all Jon. That's just holding up the dream of where we are going. What it's all about. People say keep emotion out of investing. Rot, say I! It's all about love. And life. Light and vision. The money is just a mechanism, like a wheel, to carry it along. [Ramsey feels ill!] But what we can do about it is much more prosaic. Click to the next page where it isn't Helen Keller's words and they put themselves in perspective. A clown's face, mouth wide open, pointy nose made from the familiar Q. A fun figure. They aren't taking themselves too seriously with that. A bit like the QUALCOMM HQ on Lusk Boulevard is not a stodgy glass and steel soul destroyer; it has a little orange hat thingy on it if I remember rightly. WirelessKnowledge is big time. Check out Yahoo! price and anything to do with the Webworld. It is psychic connection writ large. The Q's part in the Webworld of the 21st century might not be all that dominant, but they are right there in the middle of it. I thought it was great that I could download the sound, pictures and music for the demo wirelessknowledge.com via my geostationary Web satellite dish. A shame it wasn't 3D and wireless. Good things take time. Good enough for me! Mqurice PS: Gregg and Bdog, forget about the squabble on such a neat day. The sun's out and a great new venture has hit the news stands. You seem to be at cross purposes anyway. It's correct to say that Gregg, me and others think that Q! should be at least twice the price. If that is so, Bdog is right that it would be nice for guidance to be towards the right price; some hype. There seems no point to leave analysts trying to force their models to fit a low earnings for 1999 with them concluding there must be something wrong if they can't. This WirelessKnowledge company should help people see a bit more potential in The Q! Half shares each [I wonder if it is actually 51/49 like QPE or 50:50].

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next