SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
STX 279.46+0.4%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stitch who wrote (113)11/11/1998 12:23:00 PM
From: accountclosed  Read Replies (2) of 1989
 
Ok, I have a minute so let me continue on the Dell catalog.

The first product in the catalog is the Dimension desktop series:

Processor........Pentium2.......Pentium2.....Pentium2....Pentium2
Proc. speeed.....450mhz.........450mhz.......450mhz......450mhz
disk drive.......17.2g..........14.4g........14.4g.......12.9
dram.............256mb..........128mb........128mb.......128mb
display..........15" flat.......21"..........19".........17"
price............3449...........2799..........2499.......2199

The point I am trying to bring out is the first four processors are the same. Yet the drive drops off in size. The dram drops too but not as steeply. The display option is on a steep grade. To me this shows a cpu hungry public. Like people are ok with less dd and less other options for lower price. Is 17.2 gig the largest qualified at Dell?

If the situation was reversed, with the top four offerings having the same disk, but lower clock speeds on the cpu, I would say the public was disk hungry. The public is taking the bigger disks because they are available. And good common sense as killer app may come along. But this anecdotal evidence tells me it isn't the priority.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext