No, Daniel, it's not like the liberal press - no one has the opportunity to challenge them, and they never have to answer to someone when they make the kind of diversionary implications you are so free with.
Your point is that no one has the right to challenge the Liar in Chief's draft dodging because, like all your defenses of him, "everybody does it." When I give you examples of people who didn't, you try to weasel out but still can't resist attacking the messenger instead of the message:
CLINTON IS A DRAFT-DODGING LIAR.
Since you cannot refute that with facts, you continue to resort to wasting everyone's time with irrelevant issues, and when that fails, you attack the person who won the argument. It is a winning strategy from the WH standpoint. You've learned it well, but it this forum, unlike the serially-half-duplex world of media broadcasting, those with facts and opposing opinions force you to respond. Since you have nothing of substance to challenge the CLINTON IS A DRAFT-DODGING LIAR fact, why should we pay any attention to you at all?
Mr. K. |
