International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: C L who wrote (1298)	1/10/1997 2:47:00 AM
From: TheBusDriver	of 35569

CL.... Understood....this is the same way I feel....I think we investors jumped the gun on Pt. numbers and read more into the prez. report than was really there. There is a good argument to be made for very good numbers rather than very small numbers.....I think the recovery process improved gold by about 6x....IF we're lucky the Pt. numbers will be better than this and IPM is worried about the SEC wanting to know just what is going on. Actually worried ins't the right word...it's a drag eveytime the gov't gets involved. I heard that IPM had hired some wall street lawers to help them with PR and stuff like the SEC....Have you heard the same thing? I agree that if Pt. numbers were small it would not be unsettling to the markets in general. However if we have a major Pt. deposit here it could be very unsettling to a very controlled market(by other gov'ts). wayne

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next