>>> Charles, I may not know what I'm talking about, but at least I'm not afraid to challenge my assumptions.
Well, lets see you do that then.
>>> So far the left's position on this thread has been pretty weak at best.
So far the right on this thread this month have had 'loser' written all over them. Enjoying the circus in Washington this week? Who will you want for the new speaker, whip, and so forth. Have fun during the elections?
Hey by the way your petition is an Internet joke. Don't tell me you believe it. It is an embarrassment like the Computer Scientists Association that supposedly was supporting MSFT in their problems. They got wide coverage in the media until they claimed to have 2.5 million members, a number exceeding the total full time programmers in the country, let alone 'computer scientists.' Programmers on the internet picked up on that, and the press got the picture from them, and started actually investigating their source (for a change.) Then their web site turned out to have something to do with Lyndon LaRouche.
If you have any interest in environmental science, I suggest the pages of "Science", published by the AAAS, to you.
Myself, I also got my opinions from studying biology and chemistry and spending time working as a water chemist doing environmental studies and inspections for a state Department of Environmental Quality. I was just a technician, doing the grunt work of science, and for just a few years, but I think I at least know what to read and who to rely on, aside from what I collide with on the internet. You, on the other hand, seem to have no knowledge of your own on the subject. I suggest giving up.
Perhaps this is just a way to divert the debate from all the losing strategies the repubs have been employing lately, though, eh?
Why aren't the press *more* alarmed about glabal warming? They think its another one of their own disaster stories, is why, like killer bees. This comes from letting weathermen, communications grads, and sports reporters become anchormen.
Cheers,
Chaz |
