Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 159.59

-3.9%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gregg Powers who wrote (18325)	11/13/1998 7:40:00 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) of 152472

You will agree that as a high profile product the Q represent's an intregal role in Qualcomm gaining name recognition. As with you I am biased and tend to purchase Qcom product's. If for nothing else to help a company in which I have a 6 figure investement. I would assume you have a built in bias having an 8 figure investement. As a consumer(trying to ignore my bias) I tend to drift towerd's other product's. I already have a preconcieved notion about Motorolla having only owned their phone's for many year's. I see the Nokia 6160 and it's unbelievable feature's. When I see Qcom fall short it bother's me. Even though I understand why, as an unbiased consumer I would vie for other product's. I understand that this doesn't matter currently, but in the future the gap must be narrowed. I agree that Weight is unimportent after a certain point. I alway's prefered the ELITE to the STAR-TAC. I thought it had better feature's and was much sturdier. My concern lies within the standby time's. I am realy jealous of 6160 TDMA owner's who get several day's of standby time's.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next