Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (41466)	11/14/1998 11:31:00 AM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Read Replies (2) of 1573850

Re: "The yield numbers ~150/300 are quite frankly piss poor yield. I thought they could do better than that." Keep in mind AMD is still producing 300s and 333s, where the yield will be higher. The number the article cited was yield on the 350s. The funniest thing is that you just made a detailed post on how Celeron yields of 70/wafer made GREAT MONEY for Intel: exchange2000.com As Maxwell correctly pointed out in response, that 70s number means Intel is only getting 50% yield on its 00-333 MHz parts: exchange2000.com Pretty amusing, really. I guess you think its okay for Intel to get a 70% yield on its low end garbage, but AMD "could do better than that." I'm glad you have such confidence in AMD! Take off those Intel blinders, Elmer. Kevin

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next