SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation
WDC 140.22-8.9%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ausdauer who wrote (3937)11/15/1998 6:33:00 PM
From: Craig Freeman  Read Replies (1) of 60323
 
Ausdauer, I can't see how overlapping image processing with new picture acquisition would have any effect on memory requirements. And since the task only requires a few MB of ordinary (non-flash) RAM and some additional microcode, cost/weight/size issues are virtually nonexistent.

In the past week or so I've read and responded to a number of posts concerning image size and memory requirements. The following is a summary of the pertinent points:

1) To equal film resolution, images consume ~6MB uncompressed and an average of 1.5MB compressed.

2) Some users will want to snap dozens and dozens of high-res pictures between downloading.

3) The new 340MB IBM drive will store ~200 hi-res photos and permit downloading at a very rapid clip.

4) There are no existing or announced flash memory products that offer equivalent storage capacity or download speed.

5) The cost of the IBM drive is about half that of an equivalent number of CF cards and is expected to fall over time (as is flash memory).

6) An IBM drive built into the camera will weight ~20g and ~0.2" of thickness. A CF adaptor and card weigh even more and are approx. the same thickness.

7) Since no one expects a camera to survive a drop onto concrete, shock damages issues are eliminated by locating the drive inside the case.

If you accept the arguments of others that people want/need hi-res and lots of capacity, it's hard to argue with the concept of building drives into high-end cameras. Ultra-high-end cameras will also feature an auxiliary disk/CF slot while lower-cost models will rely solely upon a combination of in-camera flash, Sony super-floppies, Clik! and/or CF.

All we need now is for someone to create a portable 4X CD-Writer (Sony PhotoMan 2000?). Photo fanatics and pros will then be able to snap 200 pictures, burn a $2 CD in <10 minutes, and then snap another 200 pictures.

Craig
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext