Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 165.07

-1.0%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gregg Powers who wrote (18373)	11/16/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: Mika Kukkanen	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Gregg: Where is the reference to needing Qcom's IPR? There is not! We all have our theories, but there was no reference that Ericsson needing Qcom IPR (unless of course they enter the IS-95 world). It is fact that Qualcomm have stated that they will not license their IPR for anything but a converged (let's say cdma2000 centric) CDMA 3G system. Ericsson have stated they do not need Qcom IPR, but the rather b(B)old statement that Qcom have issued implies "ransom". In my history of telecom's this is unprecedented...the "contentious" point you were looking for? In reality Ericy might need it, to make things easier, but then Qcom might need Ericy IPR. So this maybe an issue of cross licensing? Regards, Mika

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next