SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BeanCounter who wrote (34408)11/16/1998 8:00:00 PM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (1) of 35569
 
BeanCounter, you came onto the IPMCF thread, which is currently in
Bankruptcy Court, Chapter 11, and told all current shareholders that
they are fools because long ago you warned them that this investment
was a foolish one, not because it was a scam, but because the Shorts
were going to make money off it, and drive it into the ground.

Well, BeanCounter, stock price went from 14 to .05 as you predicted.

So now you return to rub salt into an open wound.

And I wonder if your posts on the other thread you visit are also done
with the same attitude, so I present below replies from threaders,
to you, and let them give the answer to how others view your presents.

To: BeanCounter
Beancounter: I don't know if you shorted XYZ or not but if you did...
Why ?
then how the heck do you see

To: BeanCounter
Shorty, You have me confused.
Would you like to clarify your statement
you are underestimating the caliber of person on this thread
statements without backup facts or good reasoning do not carry much weight.

To: BeanCounter
Beancounter, For the most part, those posting here have been regulars
for a long time and have shared information with the others for the
benefit of all. It has been a small but worthy group of followers.
It has always been a friendly atmosphere and new participants
have been welcome.
I don't think that when an individual offers some information,
a request for a further opinion or clarification is out of line,
but certainly, it is that individual's prerogative and we do,
in fact, respect that.
That said, your comments, and its implication was uncalled for.

To: BeanCounter
Beancounter: You owe him an apology, IMO, as he asked a perfectly
reasonable question and did nothing to deserve your hostility.
quick trading profits. By the way, are "flipping" -- usually IPO related
-- and "pancaking" -- an option "strangle" perhaps? -- actual
professional terms? If so, what do they mean?
While we may not be "professional" enough for you on this thread, we do
exchange views and ideas freely, often with sage advice and good results
and, importantly, with a minimum of rancor -- until now.

To: BeanCounter
On what basis? Explain your theory.

To: BeanCounter
Beancounter: Now if you are a beancounter you will be able back up
up a statement like that with some facts.
In my experience when a new poster comes on and makes a statement like
that that it is a short player trying to help his position. In one of
your posts some months ago you said that you flipped in and out of XYZ.
While we agree that around here everyone is entitled to an opinion
wheather it is right or wrong, however if you are going to make
statements you will be questioned to see if your statement has any basis
in fact. Your Statement, On what basis do you make this statement.

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext