SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Silkroad

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (60)11/16/1998 9:12:00 PM
From: Sector Investor  Read Replies (2) of 626
 
<<The more profound effects, I believe, will be to break the lock that the industry now has been subjected to by yet another seemingly cast in stone approach, namely WDM, to increasing transport capacity on fiber >>

First let me say that this thread's technical level is way beyond my
skills.

However, let me venture a question anyway - don't bite my head off.

Silkroad claims a 90+GB/sec pipe using only one wavelength, thus faster, cheaper, simpler, etc. than DWDM - and the technology is supposedly scalable to the terabit/sec range.

But DWDM so far I think has been simply increasing the number of wavelengths sending concurrent OC-48 datastreams - probably because this is a common connection speed today.

Surely this is not anywhere near the limits of this technology? If pushed, cannot the existing DWDM technology increase to OC-192 or OC-768 data streams without great add-on cost, instead of moving to say 120 wavelengths from 80?

In other words DWDM is now the entrenched technology. "Breaking that lock" may be more difficult than it might seem at first glance, if the industry responds for the first time to a challenging technology.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext