SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cameron Dorey who wrote (4246)11/17/1998 7:07:00 AM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) of 10072
 
>>Thnks, Rocky, I like it, real chemistry being used to improve a product.<<

Cameron -

No, no. You don't get it. This is bad. It's bad because . . . well, because ... well, because Iomega is BAD, don't you see?

If Iomega did it, it must be bad, stupid or crazy.

Here's an example. Castlewood's Orb drive won't be shipping until 1999, even though they originally said it would be shipping in Q1 1998. That's because Castlewood really cares about their customers and they want to make it perfect. The Castlewood CEO says it will outsell everything, which proves Iomega is doomed.

Iomega's VAPORUB! drive won't be out until late Q4 or early Q1, even though they said it would ship in the second half of 1998. That's because Iomega's shifty management wants to hype the stock so they can sell it to newbie suckers. Never mind that management has actually been buying. That's just part of the scam!

Why don't all you Iomaniacs listen to me, the Standardbearer of The Truth?

Signed,

E. "Rocket Science" Reidarelli
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext