SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : MARUM RESOURCES ON ALBERTA

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jesse who wrote (1022)11/17/1998 3:28:00 PM
From: Pete Mimmack  Read Replies (2) of 2514
 
More thoughts on the OB issue:

First, my thanks to you and Rick for all the info.

Second, apparently not everyone agrees with his assessment that you want nothing to do with OB > 50 metres since all of the MEO/Kennecott cores pulled this fall have OB in the 100-150 metre range. Granted, open pits are a lot cheaper, but they evidently believe that you can go underground and still be profitable.

Third, while I sure don't know, I doubt that "the Alberta diamond mining advantage over the NWT is greatly diminished when OB greater than 10m is encountered." Maybe I missed the post where the details are laid out, but any mine that is so much closer to major infrastructure and located in a comparatively mild climate has got to be significantly cheaper to run. Certainly, the underground would reduce the benefits over NWT, but still leave a substantial spread.

That's my two bits. Owning MEO but not MMU, I certainly don't want OB to be an issue! And I know that K likes open-pits, since I live within sight (40 miles) of the largest open-pit Cu mine in the world, their Bingham Canyon mine in Utah.

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext