VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: FMK who wrote (5270)	11/18/1998 9:25:00 AM
From: Dennis V.	Read Replies (1) of 27311

Miscellaneous musings on Midwest Patents. Analysis of speech patterns indicates that the poster is a lawyer or paralegal and that his accounts have been truthful. Since he(yes,he) is an investor, it stands to reason that there would have been continuing contacts initiated with insiders. Therefore, the assumption that information concerning COMDEX was transmitted months ago when the patent work was done is not sound. Negatives include the nature of the information which is indirect or hearsay. As a lawyer, he recognizes this. I am also interested in whether he considered legal ramifications of an announcement at COMDEX(I didn't say he was a great lawyer!). Submitted for fun, but who knows?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next