SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Russell Athletic (RML - NYSE)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacob S. Rosenberg who wrote ()11/18/1998 9:57:00 AM
From: Dale Geffrey  Read Replies (1) of 3
 
Is anybody interested in this stock? Here's some news that can't help .

Related QuotesABJ
RML
25 1/8
23 1/4
+0
+0
delayed 20 mins - disclaimerWednesday November 18, 9:23 am Eastern Time

Company Press Release

Alabama Jury Returns Verdict Against Russell Corporation And Others

ALEXANDER CITY, Ala.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 18, 1998--Late Tuesday, November 17, 1998, a Jefferson County, Alabama, jury returned a verdict in Sullivan, et al. v. Russell Corporation (NYSE:RML - news), et al. Five plaintiff families were awarded a total of $155,200 in compensatory damages for property damage and $52,398,000 in punitive damages from the three defendants, Russell Corporation, Avondale Mills and Alabama Power Company [NYSE:ABJ - news]. Allegations in the case were that textile discharges of two of the defendants, including Russell Corporation, into the Alexander City wastewater treatment plant, the subsequent treatment by the City of Alexander City and discharge into Lake Martin constituted a nuisance and indirect trespass. Alabama Power Company, the third defendant, was alleged to have allowed the nuisance and trespass to continue as the owner of the land under the lake. The plaintiffs alleged mental anguish but no damages were granted for this claim. No allegation of personal injury was made in the case.

The evidence was uncontroverted that Russell Corporation is in compliance with its permit issued by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) for the indirect discharge of its wastewater to the Alexander City wastewater treatment plant. Therefore, the Company believes the verdict is contrary to the evidence and under the applicable law, no damages should have been awarded. The Company will immediately initiate post-trial motions and appellate proceedings and vigorously pursue such actions.

''Russell Corporation is committed today, as it has always been, to protecting and preserving the environment and to the welfare of the citizens in all communities where we operate,'' said Jack Ward, chairman, president and CEO. ''We believe this verdict is contrary to the evidence presented.''

It doesn't look like there is any activity for the stock yet today.

Dale
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext