Hey, some interesting "conversation." My two-bits says it does not follow that because one has a patent portfolio that one can adjudicate the efficacy of another patent portfolio, eh? Now exactly WHAT did I say, heh! Simply put, that unless a person has detailed experience in the area the patents are applied against, in this case, battery technology and all its relevant permutations, then merely having the ability to ascertain the "patent applicability" issues is not enough to establish the merits of the details of said patents, no? So too as it relates to the merits of that same individuals evaluation. As for "guru" status…..LOL!!! All be suspect on threads such as this, and this is particularly true when individuals stay hidden by pseudonyms. Bottom Line, individual d.d. is a MUST.
But keep up the chatter. The floor-less convertible issue was beaten into the ground, and now this patent "thang" appears to be having the same experience, too. Good stuff and it helps clear(maybe) the air. Heh!
John~
|
