SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (36833)11/18/1998 11:24:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
paul, we agree 100% that mucho denaro (sp?) will be spent. i guess my question is why will the money be spent on computers rather than software fixes? will the software fixes be cheap enough to allow for extra, nonessential box purchases? or, rather, will they take so many financial resources that nothing is left over?

i've heard absurdly high estimates just for the code. the reason 1/5 companies don't have a budget is b/c it isn't easy to spend this kind of dough.

if companies actually go out and buy lots of boxes as part of their solution then intel will do well in 1999. if not, though, then it will be a rough road-a-hoe.

another question. if i'm an office manager, why would i buy my assistant anything more than a p200 for $200-400 (next years prices for many name brand boxes)? isn't that good enough?

my friend uses a pii400 at work. he has no need for it. a p133 would do fine. do it managers continue overspending to keep their budgets or do they actually begin doing a reasoned cost/benefit analysis and come up with cheap yet powerful boxes?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext