Intel's post split decline totally unrelated to split then. It was a market wide phenomenon. Intel also was not in the process of bringing out the MMX, the Pentium Pro, Klamath, and Deutsches chips. I don't think Intel will face the same situation now. Given the fact that the next 12 months will be the most tumultous in Intel's history the movement of the stock looking out 6-8 months will be connected more to the fundamentals of the Pc industry than a split. IOMG, are you serious, Iomega is a pipsqueak company with no global presence, no dominance, no market clout, no real institutional backing, no global alliances, no real R&d, threats from everywhere, including DVD. To compare and even mention (how could you even muster the neurons to come up with that one) Iomega in the same breath is laughable. Iomega is a big nobody, hope you don't own any. Citing other companies is irrelevant, stick to discussing Intel's situation. And when you talk about Intel in terms of the decline post split, I am still glad I bought intel at those post spilt firesale prices, look where we are only 1 year later. Would anyone argue that that decline was a technical blip that only stands to show that post Spilt Intel was more attractive than it ever was.
The defense rests,
Case Dismissed
Chuckie |
