Bob, lets replace all Clintonian stuff with on target facts.
First all questions and concerns have to be clearly understood.
Answers and replys can then be make for a precise match.
The clearer and more direct and precise the question, the easier it
will be for the responder to give a reply to satisfy the person asking
the question, and in the same way, answers to advoid answering will be
easier to identify.
So Bob, in you reply to Dave, you expressed concerns that took the form
of questions and opinions. You then asked others on this thread to join
in and discuss these issues. Ok, but if you want non-Clintonian returns,
then you have to expand more on your post, to put facts down in the same
way that you want facts presented in return. No wiggle room question
means no wiggle room answer. Vague in, vague out.
If you want facts and figures, ask for them in a request, not a question
that implies "things are not correct".
I copied from your post, presented below.
I'am sure you and Dave and most others on this thread understand
much much more of what being talked about than I do, but so that
others can also join in, please expand out your post.
Thanks, and follows are from your post.
(1)
How the claim can be made that the limited operation of the mill
proved (confirmed) anything, except that there were problems
and that it was worn out to begin with, is absolutely beyond me.
(2)
The duration of operation and the net production says only that there
were huge problems that some may think they know the answers too.
(3)
Sorry, the spin in the release reaffirms my worst fears of MGR.
Bob, you asked me in another post, my actual holding in MGR.
My aveage for 80,000 is around Canadian 12 cents, US 7.5 cents.
So as of present, I'am in the looser catagory. But Bob, where
I hold each share at 12, you can get at 7, or last week 5.
Doug |
