SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Vidikron Technologies Group (VIDIC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: n/a who wrote (94)1/13/1997 12:28:00 AM
From: Randy McWilliams   of 782
 
Chris N/A Thank you for your candor and observations. The resolution of the dmd engine that PJTV is using I believe is 800x640. I don't think TI is shipping or maybe even producing the engine with a 1024x768 resolution (at least in large quantities - perhaps the new TI building will be making these chips). The present PJTV tv should find a nice niche, especially IF and when the price comes down. The higher dmd resolution engine will cost more and be at the higher end of the tv market. I think we are dealing with also two engines verses three (better color with three). I believe that the three engine TV produces spectacular color and brightness and will also be quite expensive (initially at least). The questions are whether PJTV will continue on at the 800 x 640 resolution and capture this market and whether they will also be able to provide the higher resolution tv at a much later date. At this point, in my opinion, their present tv is quite competitive with the market they are addressing.

I think you bring out good points regarding this company. Putting money in these types of companies is risky. They have a nice product and hopefully they can deliver it soon to the market. If they do, the stock price should go up and of course if they don't then ... Investing in these companies is not for the faint of heart.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext