SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (818)11/20/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: Charlie Smith  Read Replies (1) of 5853
 
Frank:

My initial response is that nobody can afford to either replace what is there now (which, as you pointed out, would be stupid), or install FTTC. But the limiting factor is not the cost of the fiber, the switches or the backbone, even if you gold-plate all of it. The problem is that there aren't enough backhoes (and drivers) in existence to get the job done economically before wireless becomes a viable alternative.

You're right. Money cost is not the only factor, but in an environment where telecom service prices are falling, higher capital costs certainly don't make the proposition more attractive. I don't expect WCOM to duplicate what is there, and therefore the RBOCs are not necessarily the road pizza so many say they are. Sure, Bernie et al will build where they can skim the highest margin RBOC customers, but they literally can't afford to quickly gouge big chunks out of these elephants. In the meantime, DSL is making more rapid progress (see recent CSCO, DELL announcements) and WCOM wants to participate.

Charlie
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext