SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: greenspirit who wrote (15411)11/20/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: Borzou Daragahi  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
All Judge Starr has done is document behavior.

Starr's ethics adviser resigned this morning over this very issue. The adviser thought Starr should take a more hands-off approach to the impeachment inquiry and not appear to be pushing impeachment. Even Starr himself said that he saw his role not so much as a mere chronicler of facts, but as an interpreter of the facts and an advocate for impeachment. This is different from the traditional role of the Independent Counsel. In retrospect, I think Starr's appearing before the cameras yesterday was good for him but bad for the impeachment process. It helped make him look like a pretty decent guy. But by aligning himself too closely with the GOP, he may have done a lot to bolster the appearance of his investigation as a partisan assault.

He should be impeached because he has broken faith with the American people, committed perjury, obstruction of justice and dishonored the office of the Presidency.

I respect your opinion.

Trust and trustworthiness are forever gone.

I strongly disagree. I think the moral of this parable is the bad things that can happen to you when you play fancy and free with the truth. IMO, it has also inspired a very healthy national ethics debate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext