SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buffettology

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tomato who wrote (575)11/20/1998 6:36:00 PM
From: Bob Martin  Read Replies (2) of 4691
 
My math and accounting skills are suspect, but my instincts tell me that KO's p/e ratio is
suspect too. Are you saying that p/e ratios don't matter at all? Or that if KO keeps growing at
15% for the forseeable future that it's ok to ignore its p/e ratio? Seems to me that given markets
tend to have a given p/e ratio that provides a ceiling or yardstick for investors. We're at
historically high p/e ratios, and I don't see IBM trading at a p/e of 24 (absent revolutionary new
products) if the market p/e reverts to the mean, which a lot of people see happening. Do you
think there's a margin of safety with IBM at a p/e of 24?

If you have a minute, I'm curious to see what your spreadsheet would give as a fair market price
for KO.
TIA.

----

OK, let's try again. I'm not saying PEs don't matter. They do very
much matter, but simple rules like PEG are useless in determining a
fair PE. You have to crunch the numbers, based on your projections.

Now as to Coke, I don't follow it, but to follow your growth
assumptions (which I neither agree nor disagree with, since I don't
follow the company): Assume 15% growth for 10 years, 5% thereafter,
9% discount rate: "fair" value PE is 40 (cash earnings, not reported
earnings). Now Buffet likes to buy stocks at a 30% discount, so if
you ASSUME KO will grow cash earnings at 15% for 10 years, and can buy
it for 28 times their current cash earnings, then it would be a buy,
following Buffett's methods. You can't assume growth of 15% forever,
because then the value of the stock is indeterminate (i.e. infinite).
In other words, if you really, really believe KO will grow cash
earnings at 15% per year, FOREVER, then, no, the PE doesn't matter,
just back up the truck and keep buying shares. Personally, when
I do my own evaluations/projections, I never assume a high growth rate
(i.e. greater than 5%) for more than 10 years, after which I assume
5%.

Regarding comparing PEs of stocks (you mention IBM) relative to the
market. I don't buy the market, so I don't care about the market's
PE. I buy stocks, so I only care about the stock's PE. Markets
fluctuate, and if you plan on holding a stock for a while, you are
essentially making assumptions about the company's long-term growth
prospects, and in that time, the market could go through many cycles,
none of which I feel capable of predicting. Remember what Buffett
says regarding stocks: "Short term, the market is a voting machine,
but long term, it's a weighing machine". What he means is, short term
there are hundreds of factors that can affect a stock, but long term,
it's the growth of the earnings that matters! So find excellent,
well-run companies that have good management and great products, which
have a good track record of growing profits, and then wait for the
market to price them stupidly (low). It will happen eventually. And
when it does, load up.

Regarding a fair market price for KO, I don't follow it, so I couldn't
say. The main 3 things it depends on are: Current cash earnings,
growth assumptions, and discount rate chosen. I know what your growth
assumptions are (15%/yr), and 9% I feel is a reasonable discount rate
to use, but I don't know what KOs current cash earnings are.

I'll see if I can find out before I leave.

Bob
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext