CTSI - CABG Minimally Invasive Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : CTSI - CABG Minimally Invasive

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Robert Salasidis who wrote (15)	1/13/1997 3:03:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow	of 29

I have HPRT and wonder whether to buy CTSI and how the two will face off. -See posts here that CTSI is limited to single bypass? -Re 'beating heart': If this is so desirable, why hasn't it been pushed in open-heart bypass? Why wouldn't CTSI's stabilization technique apply there? -See that HPRT has teamed with St. Jude on valve replacement; it has been said that this is very small compared to bypass. Opinion? -Also some comments elsewhere that CTSI lacks a patent position if one of the biggies decides to play. (Of course buy out is still there.) -bob

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next