SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric Dickson who wrote (3655)11/23/1998 12:40:00 AM
From: Clarence Dodge  Read Replies (1) of 14778
 
Eric

This is from a thread on Anand about oc'g the 333a:

Apollyn
posted 11-19-98 04:03 PM ET (US)

Has anyone had success overclocking the Celeron 333a? I'm am looking to upgrade, and am thinking
about buying the Celeron 300a Abit 6BH combo, and noticed that for $15 to $20 more I could get the
333MHz. Would that be better, or should I stick with the 300MHz for overclocking? Thanks.
Legion

posted 11-19-98 06:29 PM ET (US)

yeah stick with the celeron 300a, you aren't going to reach 500 mhz with a 333, and the next step
would probably be 415, the 300a can reach 450 most of the time
Incubus

posted 11-19-98 11:32 PM ET (US)

Well, I'll say that I have taken three 333's to 500+. It's not easy but can be done.



posted 11-19-98 11:38 PM ET (US)

That a celeron 333a Vlad or the pentium 2? I heard the percentage of successfull 333a to 500 was only
like 10-15%, I'd say don't gamble and try the 300a to 450 which is 80%
Incubus

posted 11-20-98 10:25 PM ET (US)

Those are Celerons 333. I just got in a batch of P2's (300, 333 and 350) I'll be running next week.

Vlad
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext