Points To Ponder:
#1 - I spend very little time proof reading my postings because I have better things to do with my time. The “spelling and grammar checker” reference that I made in an earlier posting was a innuendo to an individual on this thread to stop the intentional butchering of the English language. I though that the more intelligent individuals on this thread would have understood the intent of the comment - obviously it just went over some people's heads.
#2 - If Poet is as smart as she claims to be, she would have taken the credentials that I openly offered to Len (which he graciously refused to receive) and then announced her motives. What idiot would give an individual personal information after that individual made intentional threats? - I truly hope that no one would be that dumb!
#3 - I don't take lightly your insults about my previous profession. During my many years of practice, I received hundreds of letters from grateful parents of kids with now removed life threatening psychiatric problems, from school consolers thanking me for my yearly assistance, and from churches and disaster victims for my volunteer work. I've helped more young adults positively correct and live their lives than any of you could ever hope to.
#4 - Every statement that I have made on this thread, with the exception of a few assumptions, are 100% true. The comment about female thought patterns is correct. Researchers have found that women tend to use both sides and more areas of their brain at the same time, whereas men use the side of their brain that matches the task at hand; thus, an emotional inclusion in most activities undertaken by women occurs. If you don't believe, ask Poet, or go to the store and find yourself a good book on gender traits. Maybe you'll learn something. BUT please note, if you want to discuss psychoanalysis and mental health theories, your in the wrong forum.
#5 - Unlike many of you that are more experienced with the broad selection of threads on this Web site, I have somewhat limited my scope to this single thread. My day consists of stock and company research, and a frequent round of golf - not people research. If I seem unknowing about the philosophies, integrity and gender of each patron on this site, it's because I choose not to. Any comments or postings addressed to me will be received as they are written.
#6 - My interest in this stock is purely for honest financial profit. For those of you that are not experienced enough to know that good money can be made on every exchange, especially in the Small Cap and OTC market, I can understand your comments. With one phone call, I could have all available shares and all virtual shares created by shorters of KCAP in my possession, and easily drive up the price well beyond the $10 mark. But I'd prefer to see the company prosper on its own merits, despite what many of you may believe.
#7 - And finally, I thought that I was joining an investor forum and not a chat room. I have witnessed on this thread an 80% non-stock related posting average. And yes, I have greatly contributed to this total; however, I have been one of only a few that have posted accurate KCAP facts and honest opinions on this thread. If you have a private message or insult, use the private message functions on this site. If you have stock related information, then use this public forum. If you will, then I will! If you don't, then I won't! And as disappointing as it may be for many of you, I have no intentions of exiting this forum
|
