Morning ztect,
While I have my doubts that a response to your questions will serve any useful purpose, nevertheless, I will extend to you the courtesy of a reply. I will address your points as you raised them.
> I believe there will be news released shortly addressing the numbers.<
Inasmuch as I myself, and others, have been in contact with GGNC, asking for information relating to our OS shares and their current status, and being told they are working on getting this information for us, I feel qualified to make that statement.
>I wouldn't be surprised to see a nice rise tomorrow, and a good one on Friday<
Have you spent any time doing any DD on this stock? You will note that the trendline for this stock has been on the incline for the past 10 days or so. In addition to this, I'm anticipating increased interest in GGNC Friday, due to the Sportsbook operation becoming fully functional on-line Saturday, the 28th. JMHO of course.
>Check the superstocks site in the tomorrow. :o)<
I asked some questions today pertaining to a recent release issued by superstocks. They advised me that they would contact superstocks in an effort to clarify them.
>Are you for real? Or are you just pumping?<
I would suppose that depends on your definition of real. I work hard at obtaining the best, most credible information available, pertaining to a stock I intend to invest in. As situations never stay the same, I continue my DD on a perpetual basis. I'm willing to share the results of my labors, with my fellow investors, whether it be pro or con. I never tell anyone to buy or sell, that is a decision they must make for themselves. Pumping? No, I don't think so. If I believe in a company, I will support it, by all means available to me, on the other hand if I don't, I will also express my views regarding this as well. Substantiation, check post #2051 of the adot thread.
>What are your reasons for your optimism?<
My reasons are many, and are grounded in my past and present DD. I suggest you read the GGNC thread from the beginning, paying particular attention to my posts. I believe the reasons will become obvious to you.
>Is the superstocks site promoting this company?<
Of course. If you had read a few posts back, you could have found this out for yourself. Read my post # 335 of this thread.
>If so, did this site receive free shares for promotion?<
I'm assuming by this site, that you are referring to the superstocks site? As to how they are compensated by GGNC, I have no knowledge of this. That is one of the questions I hope to get answered soon.
>Is the disclaimer for these shares clearly noted?<
To the best of my knowledge it is. Again, I referr you to post # 335 of this thread.
>Are the shares in anyway restricted, or will they be added to the float after you have successfuly pumped the price?<
Once again, I have no knowledge as to the agreement between GGNC and superstocks. I might suggest you contact GGNC and ask them yourself. As to your remark accusing me of pumping, first of all I resent it, secondly, be careful what you say, you too are accountable for your remarks.
Do you work for the superstocks site?<
I am not now, or ever have been compensated for my support or otherwise, by any company I have ever invested in, except sometimes through the appreciation of its stock price. I am purely an investor, just as everyone else.
>Enquiring minds want to know..<
Now...I would like to know, who are the inquiring minds? What do they stand to gain or lose, by attempting to infer doubt upon the integrity of GGNC and myself?
>btw- please be aware that because of certain language contained here within this post, and many that proceed it, this thread as well as several of its participants are now being monitored.
cc. enforcement@sec.gov<
Personally, I welcome any monitoring we can get. Perhaps we will pick up a few new investors from it. On a more personal note, as always, I did a little DD on you as well. I notice this is not the first time you have attempted to intimidate others with your nonsensical questions, innuendos, and threats. I would refer others to your post #2364 on the winr thread.
I ask that you also send a copy of this post to the sec, enforcement division as well. They probably have a file already started for you and a few others. My guess would be its under N, for Correspondence from NUTS. You can crawl back under your rock now.
Regards,
Blessed
|
