Int'l Freegold Mineral Development Inc./ITF/VSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Int'l Freegold Mineral Development Inc./ITF/VSE

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rick Thomas who wrote (246)	11/26/1998 9:42:00 PM
From: Mark Bartlett	Read Replies (1) of 298

Rick, At todays price of gold I would say that these are marginal results - that is not to say there is not the makings there of a potential mine - it would have to have a hell of a throughput ... almost treat it like a porphyry copper situation, like Amax did at Fort Knox (now Barrick). Still not enough drill results to make any real decisions. If they hit some higher grade stuff near the surface, could make a big difference. The structure has the makings of a very large system, so we may get some surprises. Assuming Barrick stays the course (IMO they will) still worth holding some, or picking up a little. With higher gold prices, it is a different story ... but that is true for a lot of them. MB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next