Donner Minerals (DML.V) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: 1king who wrote (9845)	11/27/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (1) of 11676

Hello 1king Thank you for you very interesting reply. 1. I assumed that since the O&G companies over here could routinely do seismic over vast areas of boreal forest, that it would not be all that onerous in Labrador. Was not aware of the logistical problem, but in light of what has and will be spent on blind drilling, that technique might take on economic parameters. 2. Actually that was my point, but I guess I did not say it very clearly. My assumption is that the feeder system (tree trunk) passes through the lower gneiss horizon before it deposits the disseminated sulphides in the upper gabro/troctolite ceiling. If any massive sulphide deposit will likely be found associated with the "tree trunk" and the gneiss is relatively un-noisey for want of a better term, wouldn't an EM or GPR survey conducted in the gneiss probing for tree trunks at that level be logical? Presumably, the only significant conductors at that level would be feeder zones and massive sulphide stringers. Does that make any sense? 3. I gather you are not aware whether Teck is using these textural/magnetic flow pattern techniques at SVB, is that correct? Perhaps a whisper in some one's ear? Thanks again. Regards

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next