SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 97.99+0.3%Nov 11 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (23522)11/28/1998 1:39:00 PM
From: PaulM  Read Replies (1) of 116753
 
IMO, everything the govt does creates winners and losers in a zero sum game. That's because neither Greenspan nor Clinton nor Congress concern themselves with building homes, making cars, growing food or designing microchips. So it seems to me every govt action is made in the context of real wealth remaining fixed in the short run.

A weaker dollar benefits exporters at the expense of importers and savers. Govt spending to "stimulate" the economy benefits industries whose products the market otherwise wouldn't want, at the expense of taxpayers.

My long winded point is: the interest rate cuts had one impact on leveraged speculators and the stock market, and ultimately a very different impact on, for example, fixed income recipients.

Official employment figures--if they are to be believed--virtually did not change at all during the market drop. So who do you think Greenspan was trying to save? Have you ever seen the FED fret over a wave of downsizing?

B, as for Europe, if the dollar isn't supported by foreigners, it will collapse. The gold short position wouldn't survive such an event.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext