Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ish who wrote (16184)	11/28/1998 5:17:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (3) of 67261

<<I meant exactly what I said. You have a problem with that tell it to me but don't be chickenshit and pester everyone else>>First of all I posted to Dan that it was curious that nobody responded to his post on your comment.Afterwards the"every one else " you speak of posted me . So I hardly think I was pestering any one. If so they are big boys and girls don't need you to speak for'm. I was the one who said you meant what you said. The others thought perhaps not.If you don't want any one commenting on your posts I would suggest you are on the wrong forum.Why didn't I post to you? Well it was considerably after the fact and since you made no effort to respond to Mr. k's post to you on the subject I didn't bother. <<The doctor was a very in your face type>> How fking relevant is this? <<was daring someone to come after him and they did>>Interesting take on the subject.I got news for you people who disagree with you on this are not required to cower in fear and live obscure lifestyles so as to prevent some sick barbarian from offing them.This is just some more self righteous bullst to justify murder simple as that. <<Did i say I did the shooting,Did I say I encouraged the shooting?>> Did I say you did any of the above? I quoted you verbatim. What's your problem with that? You don't want to be quoted too bad. << When you have the true motive behind the shooting then you can saint the doctor>>Not interested in sainting anyone. Only interested in seeing who agrees with the shooting and who doesn't.BTW do you agree to treat all murders in the manner that you speak? That is lets not judge any killing until we see what the motive is? I don't give a rat's ass what the motive was.The gutless little cowered did his dirty work from ambush! Not self defense!His motive is irrelevant! <<It was ok by me as a non event>> Good, keep posting that all you accomplish is to galvanize public opinion on the pro choice side.Some pro life people are interested in educating people to their side of the argument and creating change. Others only care about bulling their self righteous views down the throats of non believers.It won't happen. We will not be intimidated by the likes of you. pez

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next