SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : E4L, Inc. (NYSE: ETV)
ETV 13.72-1.5%Nov 20 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DOC who wrote (493)11/28/1998 8:25:00 PM
From: out_of_the_loop  Read Replies (1) of 1080
 
Sir:

I will apologize to you for calling you a thief; that was probably uncalled for. I hereby apologize for that and any mention of stealing on your part. That, after consideration, wrong on my part. I have thought about this myself for several days and I , too, will ask the SI administration to remove that post, because I know what it is like to have been accused of something that I know is not true or provable. For example, Message 6580296 , made me think about this, because, for example, the AMA does not investigate doctors (state societies do, so I knew that even if there were somebody with the same name, that statement could not be true).

As far as you are concerned, your private identity on SI is not a right - it is discoverable by law, this has been proven in court cases already; so you must do what you must do and we will see where it goes. Your identity will be revealed as soon as your complaint or subpoena or whatever comes in the mail (you cannot charge someone anonymously in this country) or is delivered.

So, in summary, I apologize for calling you a thief; that was unfair. The rest, you must do what you must do. We will see who you really are then.

Sincerely,

Howard Epstein
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext