SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Laser who wrote (6725)11/30/1998 12:42:00 AM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (2) of 11603
 
Laser, you are upfront as identifing yourself as a shorter.

I have a good memory, but its of a small capacity.
Accounts of you have been overwritten with new stuff,
and I don't remember if we exchanged crap posts in the past.
You can nullify this take, but I'll assume either not,
or if so, you also don't remember, so lets agree to disagree
and exchange posts of a bland nature.

Lets debate non technical mining stuff. The important stuff,
that which really will decide success or not for Maxam,
Richard and the others will handle.

Just so we don't have a debate on whether or not you are a threat
to Maxam, as a shorter, lets just say that you are here only to keep
an eye on a possible company to short. As in, you only short companies
that will fail in the end, shorters present or not.

So, the next paragraph is not about you.
You is an honest shorter.

This thread knows shorters are out there always,
looking for an opportunity to make money that other old fashion way,
they try to take it from those that worked honest for it.
Like a common criminal, or an organized gang of hoodlums.

They may work hard for the money they make,
being dishonest and coning and scaming people may require hard work.
Depends on the amount of greed and talent a shorter has.

Lets keep any posts between us as civil and no name calling.

You said:

<<< ... I think there is good potential in Maxam right now based on the
fundamentals and the current share price. A four or five bagger isn't
out of the question, just don't forget to sell when you're ahead. >>>

If mxam was over one dollar in the past, and its now ten cents,
an x4 or x5 on good news, is as you say easy stuff. But then you
mention to sell if you are then ahead. Yes if Maxam is not for real,
or with poor future potential. But if the soon released test results
are going to be as good as hyped, the "too good to be true" numbers,
then a year from today the first digit on the right side of the decimal
point will not be important. And three years from today the first digit on
the left side will not be where its happening.

So, buy at .10 and sell at .50.
To get the type of return the COC implies for the near future makes
this buy/sell poor investment advice.

Buy between .10 and .99, and then sell after x5 or x55.

<<<... I still think you guys are wrong in painting all naysayers with the
"short" or "hidden agenda" brush. Believe it or not, some people do feel
obligated to present an opposing viewpoint. >>>

If the counter posts are to cause hurt and damage, then what tag or
name or group is used as identification is not important. All that
matters is that they represent evil and as such deserve contemp.

<<< ALL threads have negative posters, some are pretty abusive,
but I doubt they are all shorters. A pain in the ass maybe >>>

Shorters taking advantage of poor management or unluckly market conditions
are part of the speculation makeup. But to have people spend time and
money to build something, only to see a person come along trying to destroy
what has been made, .... Nope, no can accept.

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext