Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jon Tara who wrote (16430)	11/30/1998 1:54:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) of 18444

Then, JT, what you're telling me is you don't know what an employee/employer contractual dispute is all about. That's pretty limiting supposedly for a guy with all of your experience. If you want to put fraud on a company, you use an issue other than an employment dispute. And that wasn't Brady's intent. His words described an "ex-simmers" lawsuit that "they" filed against Softbank and Ziff-Davis. By his writing, he leaves the impression it was filed against Zulu. Let's minimalize it for your better understanding. When a claimant and a company are in dispute over an employment benefits claim, is fraud really an issue, even though there may have been a disception of some kind? And were you the claimant appealing such a decision, you''d eventually wind up in a court proceeding, before an administrative judge in a civil action. This is akin to what you're trying to pin on Zulu. What you're hung up about concerning Bob Colvin's case is an employment issue, not a fraud. You cannot change Brady's words or his intent for him. He has to live with his own remarks. I believe they're wrong and continue to challenge them. Besides, you know the way Brady worded his remarks. So who are you fooling?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next