[Was there something I missed that said that you were the only one qualified to make such a review?]
No, but then again, there has been -no- public review. For example, there has been nothing in respected, peer-reviewed journals like the "IEEE Transactions on Information Theory", the most well known journal in the field. (They would be especially interested since IAS has claimed that they can violate both the Shannon-Hartley limit and the Nyquist sampling criteria.)
So, here's my challenge - give me the citations for any peer-reviewed, independent analysis of DWM in the technical literature. There are a number of large engineering schools around here, with extensive libraries, so I wouldn't have any problem finding the research papers. (And yes, I've periodically checked places like the COMPENDEX database, but oddly enough, there is no mention of IAS or DWM.)
[Even if they did, you have previously stated that Professor Lusignan is part of a hoax]
That's not what I said in the past - if I recall, I pointed out that someone's objectivity might be compromised because of a paid grant to study something. But then again, where are Lusignan's results anyway? Why aren't they public? |
