Brady, you're letting your prejudice interfere. Note the remarks in your PS script at the bottom of your Zulutekie reference. That's prejudice.
At any rate, here's my view which I posted on Yahoo in response to Zulutekie's post:
Pat Hayton Stepping Aside?
It's always been my impression he would like to step aside and that never wanted to be in the limelight in the first place. But given that there's been no effective and functioning CEO and COO team, he's had to take on roles perhaps he's not best suited for.
It would seem prudent that he holds the best interests of Netvest first and foremost, since Netvest supported him and has backed what he's doing. Thus, there could well be a conflict in so far as his management style being in the best corporate interests of the company. Perhaps he, too, is in a box.
Whatever the horrible implications (10 to one is no joy) of the ratio merger of two OTC:BB companies, we 'little guys' are left only with two choices: a) Give up and sell at a loss and invest elsewhere; or, b) hang in there in the hopes that the combined entity, under a new CEO and COO and a reduced Hayton role, can make a run at the original business plan which, thus far, has had all the luck of being a dart board.
Of course there is a third choice as well: Own nothing and complain,
complain, complain, complain in a voice louder than those who actually own the stock. Those who select this option I find odder than some of the complexing moves Pat Hayton has made.
|
