Doug, <<taken notice of by Maxam>> Yes, Maxam follows the "adventures" of all the dirts. Remember that these dirts will be remembered for changing the fortunes of mining. Rolling the foreskin of technology back on such a significant event won't come easy, or without problems. It's the nature of the beast, innovators call the problem maker Mr. Murphy. The basis is that God, the designer and creator of the universe gives man creative process to advance His plan, but that plan requires that man must work for benefit. Mistakes are part of the learning and development process.
<<I think Dale Runyon is active at the site.>> Yes and no. Dale is in good communication with the site activity, he's directly involved in the management and planning. However, Dale is not a trained technical person, he relies heavily on consultants to bring the technology necessary for success at Maxam. I have no doubts that major miners have significant technology, but the things that Maxam are showing us is truly amazing for its size. I suspect that the significance of that technology to shareholder value is way beyond the interest and skill of most Maxam investors, but that in part is why I'm still here after the recent Maxam disappointments.
<<try and stop the desert dirts, then would it help to bring this out into the light>> This subject has come up a number of times on SI desert dirt threads. This is conjecture that is very difficult to prove. Look how people responsible to advance mining in AZ behaved towards IPM. Posting negative information with aliases. If people are willing to be deceitful to satisfy ego, imagine when there is financial interest. I truly believe that there are "interests" working to undermine the desert dirts. |
