I guess, Aleta, you passed on by my several comments today regarding the company. Instead you only saw my remark about Brady making a prejudicial comment (which he did), while choosing to diminish the rest of what I said within that post. And then you try to say I implied you as fat and ugly--I did not do this (go back and read the post).
Now, objectively, who is inflaming who here? And then, of course, there's your 'Lil Ms. Perfect' speech which always so effectively tugs at the heartstrings of HIGHPLANESDRIFTER types.
To Jon and Aleta:
Now, Jon, regarding your remark? Why don't you and Aleta both share the same mirror so as to reflect your own remarks. Let's see now, the two of you can be insulting to me, but I can't be insulting to you? Is this yet another standard you two unilaterally impose? Heck, the fact I point out a flaw here and there should not be construed as an insult. But it's so true--isn't it?--that the two of you have no qualms whatsoever about heaping insults me. Again, you've set a two-faced standard, to which I will never adhere.
I guess you're just unhappy that I respond and simply don't shrivel up or go away. You don't realize how many folks the two of you have made afraid to post on these threads. You're seen as "sharks" to many. Frequently, I get an email or comment from someone saying: (paraphrased) I don't want to go up against him or I don't want her barking at me.
If anyone should tone down, perhaps it should be the two of you who write the most but have owned the least amount of stock for the longest period of time measured against the quality of your input: Jon, you never owned any; and Aleta you've boastfully daytraded a couple of times.
How come the two of you can't let the folks who own this stock have a meaningful conversation, free of your redirecting. Sure occasional input from the two of you is more than welcome. But do you need to have controlling input? Now there's an unfair standard, wouldn't you say? Neither one of you deserve controlling input on this stock discussion thread. Do you understand that? |
