Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (16697)	12/2/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (2) of 67261

>Let me put it this way, if somebody is working for me, and they publish pornographic material on a website that is in my companies intranet - I expect to be fired for it. ... since Starr was the person who knew the contents of the report, it was HIS responsibilty to manage the distribution of it, in some way.< Quite fallacious. Congress is not subordinate to Starr. Your first statement by no means supports the second. Indeed your logic is completely backwards. LOL To use your scenario: Had you (Congress) a subordinate (Starr) who had given you pornography (the report), and then you chose to publish it on your firm's intranet (the WWW), then you and not the subordinate should be responsible for the publication, even though the subordinate knows the content of the pornography. (gotta run)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next