Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pezz who wrote (16721)	12/2/1998 3:27:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) of 67261

>>I don't know but because he lied under oath given questions that I believe should have been asked it self does not give me cause to think he would<< You see Pezz, this is where I think you really miss the point. Clinton had several "honorable" options before him in that situation. He chose none of them. Instead he chose to subvert the justice system and deny the constitutional rights of an individual. So where do we go from here, next time you go to court and testfy, you plan to "decide" which questions are reasonable (not the judge of course) and then lie under oath when the answers don't suit your sensibilities? You think you'll be "censured" by the court if your lie is discovered? bp

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next