SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INTCW

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: rd who wrote (28)1/15/1997 10:19:00 PM
From: kolo55   of 78
 
Split won't happen until after May shareholder meeting

When the stock splits, the warrant exercise price also splits. The new exercise price for March 15, 1998 expiration will be $20.875. Therefore the warrants will trade according to following formula:

Warrant price = (Stk price - $20.875) + some premium

Using the formula for the pre-split exercise price at expiration and today's closing prices we can estimate the current premium.

Warrant price = (Stk price - $41.75) + some premium
103 = (142 - 41.75) + premium
so the premium = $2.75

The premium exists for several reasons. But the two important reasons are the time value of the $41.75 for the next 15 months, and the lost dividends that the warrant holder gave up by buying warrants instead of the stock. There will be five lost dividends of 0.05, so $0.25 of the premium is due to this. This leaves $2.75 - 0.25 = $2.50 as the time value cost of the $41.75. The effective annualized interest rate is 5.0%. If the individual investor can get more than a 5% return elsewhere, and understands the leveraged nature of the warrants, then there is no good reason to buy the shares instead of the warrants.

Based on same calculations, the premium in mid-May will be $0.94 per post-split share. Therefore the differential between the stock price and the warrant price will be about $21.82, call it 21 3/4. Lets see if it happens.

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext