SFAD @.03 PATENT NO. 4,4865,287 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : SFAD @.03 PATENT NO. 4,4865,287

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Vandyman who wrote (1216)	12/3/1998 12:20:00 PM
From: cAPSLOCK	of 1236

You should indeed be skeptical. Just because a company is involved with the internet doesn't mean it will be successful. Comparisons are being made to companies like yhoo, amzn, etc. The biggest problem with this erroneous comparison is Yahoo already had worldwide internet exposure before they even thought about going public. Where on earth is SFAD gonna get the exposure needed for the 'Rich and Famous' to even KNOW to come buy their Gucci watches at their site? (Man I gotta laugh at that statement anyway.) Will we see banner advertisements? Are there TV or Radio ads planned? Or should we simply expect the 'rich and famous' to know to type in 'www.incybermall.com' simply from breeding. Secondly, being an associate of AT&T is no amazing feat either. I could say that about myself if I were to use them for long distance service. I bet you a share of SFAD that they are simply AT&T worldnet distributors and that that fact is being blown out of proportion. I don't know this for sure... do your own DD. It is common for certain kinds of stock to use names of respected companies (umm say like AT&T or Gucci) when they are trying to fool people into handing over their wallets for the dream of getting rich. Could SFAD be this kind of stock I am NOT saying that it is. Someone on the SFAD thread exclaimed recently: "THIS IS BETTER THAN VEGAS!!" There may be more truth in that statement than not, except it's not actually 'better' since in vegas at least you get free drinks while they take away your money. The fundamentals of this company are HORRIBLE!!! They are authorized for just under a BILLION (yes with a B) shares!!! Go to edgar and look at their reports. Tell me if you think this company is worth, even at current valuation multiple millions of dollars. Yes yes yes, Ive heard the -restricted for 2 years- argument, but believe me, someone is selling the shares that people are buying right now. And as soon as they are allowed to start selling their restricted shares I bet they will. Now that I have gone out on a limb and told you my opinion with little reserve I imagine someone will claim I am somehow short the stock, (which would be illegal) or that I am a crooked marketmaker (as if I would have time to be playing on the internet when I am supposed to be selling stock), or that I am trying to get you to shake loose of your shares so I can buy them cheap (as if there are not enough to go around FOREVER). I assure you nothing like this is remotely true. I simply believe that there needs to be a balanced argument here amidst the mania. I am just the party-pooper. I really really do hope that each of you (and me too) will make good money on this or any other investment. I've just seen all this before. respectfully, cAPSLOCK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next