SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
STX 237.60-1.2%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frodo Baxter who wrote (280)12/4/1998 9:59:00 AM
From: Robert Douglas  Read Replies (1) of 1989
 
Lawrence,

You have mentioned twice that GB capacity is the relevant number to look at when analyzing capacity related issues. I don't agree. Unit productive capacity is the relevant number to look at. It captures all the necessary supply/demand and capacity issues related to disk drives. After all drives are still sold in units! Just because advances in technology allow the same plant to produce twice the GBs this year when compared to last doesn't mean that “capacity” has doubled. As an example; if the same resources this year now produce a 20 GB drive it does not satisfy two users who each demand a 10 GB drive.

Areal density is more analogous to quality issues in a product like an automobile. It may eventually effect unit demand by slowing the replacement cycle but this is all. Don't fall into the trap of analyzing a discrete product like you would one that is infinitely dividable.

-Robert


Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext