SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: James Clarke who wrote (5392)12/5/1998 10:58:00 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (3) of 78750
 
Jim: helpful response. Thanks. Still fighting myself on some of these real estate picks. JOE, as I've posted, I have missed for at least 20 straight years. Pretty sad. Even two months ago, I posted about it at $20, but STILL didn't buy. (It's 24+ now). Obvious mental block on my part -g-.
I've got a small position CCS and recently bought a very small amount of CDX (instead of JOE). Castle and Cook is a big land owner and developer in Hawaii, with operations in Orlando and north of Los Angeles (Bakersfield). Catellus Development owns/develops properties in Los Angeles and San Francisco. Problem with these two companies is with the evaluation. To prove that value exceeds current price -- very difficult. Plus, in a down market, there is no dividend or easily understood book value which could give some support. One supporting point is that value investors and insiders are buying (to some extent) these companies. Still, some faith and a long term outlook are required with these two (on my part anyway). I'm looking to add to my positions if prices come down a little more from current. (Note: if anyone actually does remember my earlier post on CCS, I bought about 14 and sold most in the company's Dutch tender @ 19.)

Jim, where you and I do agree is that CYM is a buy. Here, I am in your situation ala LHO. I've bought higher and averaged down. Where you are looking for a short term move to 13-14, I am looking for a long term move to 18. To me, this is a regression-to-the-mean type stock.
There hasn't been a year in the past 10 when this stock has not sold at 18 or higher. (Stock's now about 11). That day will come again. I think management is actually doing something to make that happen. Again IMO. Meanwhile, I'll take the dividend. (And of course, given my penchant for diversification, this stock, CYM, is only a small part of a diversified portfolio--- just in case you (-g-) should be wrong and the stock craters from here(-g-)).

Paul.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext