Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 223.31

+0.1%

Nov 13 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wildstar who wrote (26928)	12/6/1998 11:46:00 AM
From: Jeffrey D	Read Replies (1) of 70976

Wildstar:<<Jeffrey, I don't understand the meaning of your last post. When I wrote that note, those stocks did hit new 52-week lows that day. Was there something factually wrong in that?>> Wild, you surprised me. I thought for sure you would say the three stocks now have overvaluation in common. No, nothing factually wrong, but the question is, what was the point of your post? Were you indicating it was a buying opportunity? Were you suggesting they would go lower? I suppose you could have plugged in any of the hundreds of stocks that day making 52 week lows with AMAT and ask what they all had in common. I guess if you just wanted to point out the obvious to us that's fine. Jeff P.S. The answer is these three stocks have nothing in common just like they didn't have anything in common two months ago.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next