SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cameron Dorey who wrote (58077)12/7/1998 10:20:00 AM
From: Cameron Dorey  Read Replies (1) of 58324
 
Pradeep, re:"the clik! theoretical limits for capacity"

I don't think that Clik! was crippled to keep demand up for Zip (anyone remember the PC Jr.?). Why? Simple math:

1. The Zip 250 just came out (yes, I know they have had it working for a while), what are its dimensions: approx 100 mm x 100 mm.

2. The Clik! dimensions are approcimately 50 mm x 50 mm, according to the Iomega website.

Therefore, since A = 3.14*r^2, if Iomega uses the same technology for Clik! as they use for Zip 250, a resonable max capacity would be on the order of 60 MB, assuming that the entire area of the disk can be written on. 40 MB is probably a better number, since the center of the disk is not written on. Of course, not having seen one, I have no knowledge of the spinner contact area of the Clik! disk. The Zip disk spinner contact plate is approximately 25 mm dia.

This might actually tell us something about why (1) it has taken the Clik! so long to come out and (2) the Clik! is being introduced simultaneously with the Zip 250: you couldn't use the old Iomega technology, you had to use the Zip 250 technology. Why not kill two birds with one stone, in one throw?

Cameron

"When they want it bad (in a rush), they get it bad."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext