SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3DFX

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Obewon who wrote (9392)12/7/1998 11:11:00 AM
From: Scott Garee  Read Replies (1) of 16960
 
Re: Manufacturing capacity.

Here's my post from TMF on this subject.

Remember, there's a lot involved in starting up a production line. You don't just walk into a fab with a negative of your masks and say, "Hey, I'd like 300,000 of these next week." For one quarter of above expected sales it isn't feasible to bring a new vendor on line. This includes starting another line at TSMC. If you kill your margins by incurring the costs of bringing up another production line just to capture the last 10% of sales you might be accused of being incompetent. Remember, just because there isn't a Banshee in stock today doesn't mean the consumer will by a TnT. Most will wait a week or so and buy Banshee when it's available. Supplies are steadily coming in on them (and immediately heading out.)

Also, TSMC wasn't chosen only for their production capacity. They were also selected based on quality, turn around, current and future technology, and price. TSMC is very highly regarded in the fab business (I've spoken to one of the competitive analysts at HP and he was very aware of TSMC and their abilities, down to the names of the fabs, capacities, and technologies.) His opinion was TDFX made a good decision to use them.

Addendum: TSMC has lots of .25 capacity. Why ramp up .35 production when it will be unneeded in 2 months? It's a waste of money.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext