Daniel,
I have no problem recognizing that extremism and hypocrisy come from the right side of the political aisle, but the same form of extremism and hypocrisy exists on the left.
This Carville mindset of "going to war" against conservatives and trying to settle scores outside of the courts by using manipulation and deception of the public is sick.
Gingrich decision to put the Starr report on Internet was sick.
But it does not change the facts that Clinton, through his actions, has shown that there should be a serious debate about wether or not he should be impeached.
Based on the facts, and based on the law, some people happen to think, and I among them, that he should.
The Democrats have concluded that he should not, and, in concert with the White House, think that the polls and the election of Nov 3 gives them the right to attack the process, slander the prosecutors and the Republicans.
On Nov 3, Americans reacted to what they viewed as extremism by the right, after the Starr report was made public, but they certainly did not mean to give the Democrats on the HJC a pass to become attack dogs and to make sure that impeachment would never come to be voted on.
I found the behavior of many Democrats on the HJC during the Starr testimony repulsive and despicable, and you should too.
|
